Upon the publication of the book Faslul-Khitaab over eighty years ago, there was great rejoicing amongst the enemies of Islam, in particular, the missionaries and orientalists. They liked the book so much that they decided to translate it into their own languages. It is no wonder, since it contained hundreds of lies such as those mentioned in this site, along with slanderous fabrications against Allah and the choicest of His creation, the Holy Prophet of Islam (upon whom be peace), and against the venerable Companions (may Allah be pleased with them all).
There are two clear texts from Al-KAAFI of Al-Kulaini, which elucidate the Shi’ites’ perverse position regarding the Qur’ân. The first reads:
I heard Abu Ja’far (upon whom be peace) say: “None of the people has claimed that he collected the Qur’ân completely as it was reveal- ed except a liar. No one collected and memorized the Qur’ân as it was revealed except `Ali bin Abi Taalib and the Imams after him. 16
Every Shi’ite is required to believe in this text from Al-Kaafi as an article of their faith.
As for us, Ahlus-Sunnah, we say that in fact the Shi’ites have falsely attributed the above text to Al-Baaqir Abu Ja’far. The proof of our position is that `Ali, during the period of his caliphate in Kufah, never resorted to or applied any version of the Qur’ân other than that with which Allah had favored the Caliph `Uthman by the distinction of its collection, publication and popularization and by its legal application in all Islamic lands for all time up to the Day of Judgment. If it were true that `Ali had a different version of the Qur’ân he surely would have applied it in making legal rulings, and he would have commanded the Muslims to abide by its injunctions and guidance. Clearly, since he was the supreme ruler, none would have challenged his authority to do this.
Furthermore, if indeed `Ali had a different version of the Qur’ân and concealed it from the Muslims, then he would have betrayed Allah, His Messenger and the religion of Islam by so doing. As for Jaabir Al-Ju’fi who claims that he heard that blasphemous conversation from the Imam Abi la’far Muhammad Al-Baaqir, it must be noted that although the Shi’ites consider him a trustworthy narrator of traditions, the fact is that he is well known in the Sunni schools of theology as a liar and forger of traditions. Abu Yahya Al-Hammani reported that he heard the Imam Abu Hanifa saying, “Ataa’ is the best i.e., the most truthful and precise in reporting from amongst those I have come across in the field of transmitting traditions, while Jaabir Al-Ju’fi is the greatest liar I have come across amongst them.” 17
The second of the two texts from Al-Kaafi mentioned above, is attributed to the son of Ja’far As-Saadiq. It reads:
It is related that Abu Baser said: “I entered upon Abu `Abdullah These fabricated Shi’ite texts which are falsely attributed to the Imams of Ahlul-Bait are of fairly early date. They were recorded by Muhammed bin Ya’qoob Al-Kulaini Ar-Razi in the book Al-Kaafi over a thousand years ago, and they are from before his time, because they were narrated on the authority of his ancestors, the master engineers of the false foundations of Shi’ism. During the time when Spain was under the reign of Arab Muslims, the Imam Abu Muhammad bin Hazam used to debate with Spain’s priests regarding the texts of their sacred books. He used to bring forth proofs which established their having been tampered with, and altered so much that their authentic origins had been lost. Those priests used to argue with Ibn Hazam that the Shi’ites had asserted that the Qur’ân also had been altered. Ibn Hazam refuted their argument by replying that the allegation of the Shi’ites is not a proof against the Qur’ân, nor against the Muslims, because Shi’ites are not Muslims.
