Question:
****es claim that it is impossible for one man, Abu Huriara, to hear so many hadith, from our prophet (saws), hence a large number of them are fabricated.
So my question is, can you please explain to me how one man, Abu Huriara, can narrate so many hadith from our beloved prophet (saws), when he (Abu Huriara) only lived along side the prophet (saws) for a small number of years.
Also is there any man or men from the shia side who have a large number of hadith, attributed to their name.
May Allah Bless Your Efforts.
Bilal
Canada
Answer:
Dear brother, I am not aware of any rules in the science of Rejal (knowledge of narrators of ahadith) suggesting that a narrator can be rejected merely based on the number of ahadith that are narrated from him/her. If this is the only reason that a Shia brother is rejecting Abu Hurairah than I am interested to see a reference to this ruling from a Shia or a mainstream book of Rejal and that how exactly it can be applied in this case.
Having said that, I do agree that the notion of “Abu Hurairah narrating a huge number of ahadith while being with the Prophet for only few years” can raise some questions for a rational mind.
I try to clarify this by the following facts:
1.
If one counts the number of ahadith narrated in Bukhari from Abu Hurairah, one will come up with a figure more than 1000. This however does not mean that Bukhari has narrated 1000 different ahadith from Abu Hurairah. Many of the ahadith in hadith books are repeated often with minor differences in the context. According to Ibn Hajar, in Fat’h Al-Bari, there are no more than 446 ahadith from Abu Hurairah in Bukhari and the rest are just repetitions. This is equally the same for the other books of hadith. Also we cannot simply add up the number of ahadith of Abu Hurairah in different books of hadith to get the total figure. Again many of these ahadith are repeated across books of hadith. For instance according to a count by Al-Dhahabi, in Syar Alam Annobala, if we count the ahadith from Abu Hurairah in the book of Muslim (ignoring the repeated ones), we will find that only 98 of them are different from those narrated in Bukhari. It is therefore possible to conclude that the total number of narrations from Abu Hurairah in Sahihayn (ignoring the repeated ones) is no more than about 544 hadith (446 + 98). I however do appreciate that comparing to the other companions’ ahadith narrated by Abu Hurairah are significantly more.
2.
Abu Hurairah was keeping the company of the prophet from three (as narrated in Bukhari) to more than four (as stated in Fat’h Albari) years. The prophet was not a silent man, he used to advise and preach for people as much as possible. Also not all the ahadith are about narrations form the prophet, many of them are about his practices and daily life.
3.
The reports and the ahadith suggest that the life style of Abu Hurairah was different from that of most of the companions. While others were engaged with their family affairs and job, Abu Hurairah (with no wife or job) used to spend most of his time accompanying the Prophet wherever he would go and also asking him questions. Abu Hurairah also lived much longer than many of the other companions.
4.
In the mainstream school of thought Abu Hurairah is a famous narrator of hadith. We cannot rule out the possibility that there could be fabricated ahadith in some books of hadith that are falsely attributed to Abu Hurairah simply for the sake of the credit.
Based on the above, I don’t think it is hard to believe that Abu Hurairah has heard and seen a lot from the Prophet after accepting Islam.
Let me now come to the point of view of the Shia school of thought:
In the book Al-Rijal by Ibn-Dawood Helli that is one of the popular Shia books of Rijal, the name of Abu Hurairah has come as the 821st entry under the title: “The list of people who are praised and have not been considered as weak by (Shia Scholar) colleagues to my knowledge”:
I am aware of only one hadith in the main Shia books in which Abu Hurairah is categorically called a liar (that is in the book Al-Khisal by Al-Sadooq). On the other hand you will find a good number of ahadith narrated from Abu Hurairah in some of the Shia books that are considered extremely reliable by Shia scholars. Among them is Amali by Al-Toosi that (according to many Shia scholars) is even more reliable than the main four collection of Shia ahadith. According to my count, there are 34 ahadith narrated from Abu Hurairah on a variety of subjects in this book. The number is not small if you consider that usually Shia ahadith are originated from their Imams rather than a companion. In no place in these books (as far as I see) there are any comments from the author expressing any concerns about the reliability of these ahadith because of Abu Hurairah.
Many of the ahadith in praise of Ahl Al-Bayt are in fact narrated by Abu Hurairah. On the other hand many of the ahadith that Shia criticise Abu Hurairah about their content are also narrated in Shia books.
It is also interesting that there are ahadith from Ali Ibn Al-Husayn (RA), Muhammad Al-Baqir (RA), and Jafar Al-Sadiq (RA) – the 4th, 5th and 6th Imams of Shia – narrated from Abu Hurairah in the most reliable mainstream books of Hadith.
It seems like the classic Shia scholars had less problem with accepting ahadith of Abu Hurairah. It seems like the more recent Shia scholars are showing more opposition towards the ahadith of Abu Hurairah.
In my opinion there is a certain reason behind this:
There is not even a single hadith (to my knowledge) from the Prophet against Abu Hurairah. Yet, Imami Shia scholars reject Abu Hurairah based on his number of ahadith or a single hadith from Shia Imams. In comparison you will find that there are many Shia narrators who have been called liars by Shia Imams or were famous for being drunk or having false beliefs or have been even cursed by Shia Imams in some occasions. Yet (after some justification arguments that are beyond the scope of this post) their ahadith are accepted by Shia.
The book Al-Kafi, for instance, is considered as one of the main sources of Shia ahadith and was considered as an all reliable book by many classic Shia scholars (to the degree that some Shia scholars even claimed that the book had been endorsed by Imam Mahdi of Shia). Today however most of the Shia scholars do agree that the majority of the ahadith of Al-Kafi are weak. According to a very famous Shia scholar, known as Shahid Al-Thani, out of 16,121 ahadith of Al-Kafi, 9,485 are weak (i.e. 59%) and only 5072 (i.e. 31%) can be considered as authentic (Sahih) while the rest fall in between. Most of the other Shia books of hadith have a similar (if not worse) condition. Despite this, many factors (that are not directly relevant to the subject of this post) have prevented Shia scholars to openly and seriously reject this number of hadith with a clear conscious.
Overall, in my opinion, the late establishment and difficult condition of the science of Rejal in Shia and consequently the not very promising condition of the Shia ahadith (in terms of reliability) has resulted the latter time Shia scholars to criticize Abu Hurairah (knowing that rejecting him means rejecting many of the main stream Ahadith). This (in my opinion) was an attempt to equalize the conditions of the two schools of thought in terms of Hadith.
You asked: “Also is there any man or men from the shia side who have a large number of hadith, attributed to their name.”
In deed there are and I leave you with some examples with no further comments about them:
*
The Shia scholars Al-Najjashi and Ibne Dawood in their famous books of Al-Rijal and Abdul Hussain Sharafeddin in his book Al-Muraje’at state that the very reliable narrator of Shia ahadith, Aban Ibn Taqlab, has narrated 30,000 ahadith from Imam Sadiq (RA)
*
Again in Al-Rijal of Al-Kashi we read that another very reliable Shia narrator Muhammad Ibn Muslim has acquired 30,000 ahadith from Imam Baqir (RA) and 16,000 from Imam Sadiq (RA).
*
In the same book it is mentioned that another Shia narrator, Jabir Ibn Yazid Al-Ju’fi, has learned 70,000 ahadith from Imam Baqir (RA).
Dear brother, please note that in this post I only present you with a number of facts and some concluding remarks based on them. There is no question that every hadith has to be tested from both points of view of narrators (Riwayah) and content (Diraya). (Irrespective of who is the narrator or what book has recorded the hadith) any hadith that is not inline with the Qur’an, the Sunnah and, if relevant, the established facts of history and science cannot be considered as a reliable one or should be understood and interpreted in the light of the above mentioned bases.
Hope this helps.
In need of your prayers.
Abdullah Rahim
November 3, 2003
 
===========
SOME MORE POINTS
Of the 5000+ hadith that Abu Hurairah narrated, less than ten were narrated by him alone (all the remaining were narrated by other companions as well.)
It is logically impossible that he made up 5000 hadith and somehow other companions also made up the exact same 5000.
Now about Abu Huraira, may Allah be pleased with him :
Abu Hurayrah loved the Prophet a great deal and found favor with him. He was never tired of looking at the Prophet whose face appeared to him as having all the radiance of the sun and he was never tired of listening to him. Often he would praise God for his good fortune and say: “Praise be to God Who has guided Abu Hurayrah to Islam.” Praise be to God Who has taught Abu Hurayrah the Quran.”
“Praise be to God who has bestowed on Abu Hurayrah the companionship of Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace.” On reaching Madinah, Abu Hurayrah set his heart on attaining knowledge. Zayd ibn Thabit the notable companion of the Prophet reported: “While Abu Hurayrah and I and another friend of mine were in the Masjid praying to God Almighty and performing dhikr to Him, the Messenger of God appeared. He came towards us and sat among us. We became silent and he said: “Carry on with what you were doing.”
“So my friend and I made a supplication to God before Abu Hurayrah did and the Prophet began to say Ameen to our dua.
“Then Abu Hurayrah made a supplication saying: “O Lord, I ask You for what my two companions have asked and I ask You for knowledge which will not be forgotten.”
“The Prophet, peace be on him, said: ‘Ameen.’ “We then said: ‘And we ask Allah for knowledge which will not be forgotten, and the Prophet replied: ‘The Dawsi youth has asked for this before you.” “With his formidable memory, Abu Hurayrah set out to memorize in the four years that he spent with the Prophet, the gems of wisdom that emanated from his lips. He realized that he had a great gift and he set about to use it to the full in the service of Islam.
He had free time at his disposal. Unlike many of the Muhajirin he did not busy himself’ in the market-places, with buying and selling. Unlike many of the Ansar, he had no land to cultivate nor crops to tend. He stayed with the Prophet in Madinah and went with him on journeys and expeditions.
Many companions were amazed at the number of hadith he had memorized and often questioned him on when he had heard a certain hadith and under what circumstances.
Once Marwan ibn al-Hakam wanted to test Abu Hurayrah’s power of memory. He sat with him in one room and behind a curtain he placed a scribe, unknown to Abu Hurayrah, and ordered him to write down whatever Abu Hurayrah said. A year later, Marwan called Abu Hurayrah again and asked him to recall the same ahadith which the scribe had recorded. It was found that he had forgotten not a single word.
Abu Hurayrah was concerned to teach and transmit the ahadith he had memorized and knowledge of Islam in general. It is reported that one day he passed through the suq of Madinah and naturally saw people engrossed in the business of buying and selling.
“How feeble are you, O people of Madinah!” he said. “What do you see that is feeble in us, Abu Hurayrah?” they asked. “The inheritance of the Messenger of God, peace be on him, is being distributed and you remain here! Won’t you go and take your portion?” “Where is this, O Abu Hurayrah?” they asked. “In the Masjid,” he replied.
Quickly they left. Abu Hurayrah waited until they returned. When they saw him, they said: “O Abu Hurayrah, we went to the Masjid and entered and we did not see anything being distributed.” “Didn’t you see anyone in the Masjid?” he asked. “O yes, we saw some people performing Salat, some people reading the Quran and some people discussing about what is halal and what is haram.” “Woe unto you,” replied Abu Hurayrah,” that is the inheritance of Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace.”
=====
Yes, he himself answered this question when he was asked, he said that he was one of “ahl elsofaa” these people used to live in the mosque, so he was almost with the prophet every day, 5374 hadith means an average of 5 per day which is not too much for the prophet spending most of his time in mosque teaching people,
the quran was not revealed every day , 6236 verse of quran means that an average of 20 verse per month.
edit:
btw, how do you that Abu Huraira accompanied the prophet only for 3 years? you don’t trust the hadith, why do you trust the one it say that?
edit:
yes, it is known , and accepted even by non-Muslim that 1400 years ago people used to depends on their memory other than writings.
one of the conditions for a person who tell the hadith is that he has such strong memory.
it is strange that a Muslim deny what the non-Muslims are not able to deny.
@FTL
Nahju’l-Balagha is not an authentic book, and not reliable source, all your claims are false
============
Narrated Abu Huraira:
I said to Allah’s Apostle “I hear many narrations (Hadiths) from you but I forget them.” Allah’s Apostle said, “Spread your Rida’ (garment).” I did accordingly and then he moved his hands as if filling them with something (and emptied them in my Rida’) and then said, “Take and wrap this sheet over your body.” I did it and after that I never forgot any thing.
I understand the idea behind questioning the authenticity of hadiths. I feel there is alot of wisdom of many of the hadiths, however if you find something that goes against the Quran or your own rationale then don’t accept it. This why were given a brain, to help us separate wrong from right